Section 232 tariffs on medical devices are a blunt instrument for a precision industry

Section 232 tariffs on medical devices are a blunt instrument for a precision industry


image

The Trump administration has made reducing dependence on foreign adversaries a cornerstone of its economic agenda. From attempting to reshore semiconductor production to attempting to limit the use of Chinese supply chains, this administration’s protectionist policies are a significant piece of its identity. Tariffs are a core tool of that agenda. Used temporarily, tariffs could possibly be used as a negotiation tactic, but in general, they are a tax on consumers — they are a tax on Americans.

The question now before the Commerce Department is whether to use tariffs on medical devices through Section 232. The answer should be no.

Trending: Delegate at Minn. GOP convention calls for moment of silence for Derek Chauvin

Start with a fact that rarely gets mentioned: The United States does not need to build the medical device industry. We already lead it. Roughly 70% of medical technology sold in the U.S. is produced domestically, across 16,000 facilities employing 2.8 million Americans. We hold 40% of the global market share.

Continue reading

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!