Overreaching prosecution tactics face high court scrutiny in Jan. 6 cases

Overreaching prosecution tactics face high court scrutiny in Jan. 6 cases


Because I’ve followed the progress of so many of the January 6 defendants’ trials, I was fully aware of the implications — and the government’s misapplication — of the much-discussed Section 1512(c)(2) felony that has been applied to more than 350 cases. But it wasn’t until I heard the nine members of the U.S. Supreme Court grill Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar that I became genuinely frightened by the overreach of the Justice Department’s never-before-used application of this law.

Sitting in the press gallery during last week’s oral arguments in Fischer v. United States, I wrote in my notebook, “The questioning by the Justices of the solicitor general made me realize how dangerous 1512 could be.”

The background

Trending: CHILLING AUDIO: IDF Trying to Evacuate Gazans, ““We Aren’t Leaving, Kill the Children”

18 U.S. Code Section 1512, titled “Tampering

Continue reading


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!