Democrats, including a state attorney general, are all over the media saying it’s okay for protesters to storm a mosque during a religious service.
Obviously, they are not saying that in those precise words. But when a scumbag attorney general like Keith Ellison (D-MN) says that anti-ICE/pro-rapist-murderer-child-molester protesters storming a Christian church during services for the express purpose of disrupting and intimidating attendees is “First Amendment activity,” he’s saying it’s okay to storm a mosque to disrupt an Islamic worship service.
Why?
Because there is no legal difference between the two.
If it’s legal to storm a church to disrupt and terrorize, it’s legal to storm a mosque to disrupt and terrorize.
Here’s Ellison giving everyone in Minnesota the green light:
Continue reading
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!