A king lectured Congress on climate. We should listen — then do the opposite

King Charles III stood before a joint session of Congress on April 28 and delivered a polished, carefully worded message about protecting “nature.” He was too diplomatic to say “climate change” out loud — he knew which room he was standing in — but the implication was clear enough. The king of England flew across the Atlantic to nudge America toward the kind of green energy agenda that his own country has spent the last decade enthusiastically destroying itself with.

With all due respect to the crown: no thanks.

There is a question that the king’s preferred climate agenda has never honestly answered, a question that has to come before any conversation about policy, targets, or timelines: what happens to the people?

WORRIED ABOUT RISING GAS PRICES? THE EUROPE PATH DOUBLES COSTS

Any energy policy that cannot answer that question, that treats human well-being as a secondary concern or an acceptable casualty,