Why The Court’s Murthy Ruling Is Probably The Worst Free Speech Decision In History

Why The Court’s Murthy Ruling Is Probably The Worst Free Speech Decision In History


In the recent Murthy v. Missouri decision, the Supreme Court hammered home the distressing conclusion that, under the court’s doctrines, the First Amendment is, for all practical purposes, unenforceable against large-scale government censorship. The decision is a strong contender to be the worst speech decision in the court’s history.

(I must confess a personal interest in all of this: My civil rights organization, the New Civil Liberties Alliance, represented individual plaintiffs in Murthy.)

All along, there were some risks. As I pointed out in an article called “Courting Censorship,” Supreme Court doctrine has permitted and thereby invited the federal government to orchestrate massive censorship through social media websites. The Murthy case, unfortunately, confirms the perils of the court’s doctrines.

Trending: Whistleblower Steps Forward, Tells Senator Why Law Enforcement Abandoned Post Before Trump Shooting

One danger was that the court would try to weasel out

Continue reading


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!