When the Supreme Court decided Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo last year, overruling the longstanding principle of “Chevron deference” — which had previously instructed courts to no longer defer to agencies’ statutory interpretations of the law — it marked a seismic shift in administrative law. For those concerned about regulatory overreach by the federal government and restoration of constitutional checks and balances of power, it also represented a major win.
Advertisement
Yet nearly a year later, there are virtually no Supreme Court cases instructing the legal community how to apply Loper Bright. That absence leaves a major gap — for courts, practitioners, and those teaching future lawyers.
That’s why I recently filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up a
Trending: Ted Cruz Predicts When the Shutdown Will Likely End
				
			
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!