The New York Times has stealthily deleted its baseless claim that a New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s laptop was “unsubstantiated.”
The outlet quietly removed the word “unsubstantiated” from an online article on Monday in its report revealing the Federal Election Commission’s ruling that Twitter did not violate election laws when it censored the Post’s reporting on the laptop ahead of the 2020 election.
“The Federal Election Commission has dismissed Republican accusations that Twitter violated election laws in October by blocking people from posting links to an unsubstantiated New York Post article about Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s son Hunter Biden, in a decision that is likely to set a precedent for future cases involving social media sites and federal campaigns,” the initial Times report said.
The Times also tweeted out a link to the online article that contained the “unsubstantiated” claim.
But hours later, the report was updated to remove the word entirely from the article.
While it was