Earlier this week, the MAHA movement scored a monumental win after a controversial provision, which would have provided pesticide manufacturers immunity from lawsuits claiming their products harmed people, was removed from a government funding bill.
BIG MAHA WIN – Controversial Provision Removed From Funding Bill
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i
Trending: Mob Confronts Texas DPS Troopers in Street Takeover Attempt near Capitol
MAHA Action celebrated the win in Congress, but the focus has turned to the judicial branch. “The fight to stop pesticide immunity for Big Chem is far from over. Section 453, which would have shielded chemical companies from failure-to-warn lawsuits, was removed from Congress thanks to MAHA activists speaking out. But the battle continues. This Friday the Supreme Court will decide whether to take up Durnell
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!