Defense Closing Argument: No Evidence Rittenhouse a 'White Supremacist Looking for Trouble'

Defense Closing Argument: No Evidence Rittenhouse a 'White Supremacist Looking for Trouble'


Defense attorney Mark Richards presented the closing argument in the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse on Monday afternoon in Kenosha, Wisconsin, telling jurors that the prosecution had failed to prove its case.

Richards began by showing jurors a mistake that the prosecutor, Thomas Binger, had just made, proving that the first alleged “victim” in the shootings, Joseph Rosenbaum, was somewhere that the prosecution said he had not been.

The defense started out by again attacking Binger’s credibility by producing a picture directly refuting his claim that Rosenbaum was not present at a particular scene…

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) November 15, 2021

Richards attacked Binger’s claim that Rosenbaum was somehow an innocent bystander who happened to stroll into the riots in Kenosha on

Trending: BREAKING: HERO Student Tate Myre Was Killed Trying To Disarm Shooter

Continue reading

You Might Like

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend