Barrett Pushes Back Against Feinstein's Hypothetical Question: We Don't Want Judges To Be 'Legal Pundits'

Barrett Pushes Back Against Feinstein's Hypothetical Question: We Don't Want Judges To Be 'Legal Pundits'


On Tuesday, Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett danced around land mines as she told Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California that she would decide on cases as they come before her and not a moment before that.

Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, wanted Barrett to tip her hand on how she would rule under various scenarios.

“Does the Constitution give the president of the United States the authority to unilaterally delay a general election under any circumstances? Does federal law?” Feinstein asked in one exchange.

Trending: Trump Crowd Chants “CNN Sucks,” Jim Acosta Shares Video, Says “This isn’t Normal”

Barrett replied that she would rule upon cases, not on speculation.

“If that question ever came before me, I would need to hear arguments from the litigants and read briefs and consult with my law clerks and talk to my colleagues and go through the opinion-writing process,” she said.

TRENDING: Joe Biden Slurs His Way Through Opening Remarks: ‘Because Uh, by Cause It’s Ellen General Motors’

BARRETT:

Continue reading

You Might Like

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend