Amy Coney Barrett on Originalism: 'You Would Not Be Getting Justice Scalia. You Would Be Getting Justice Barrett'

Amy Coney Barrett on Originalism: 'You Would Not Be Getting Justice Scalia. You Would Be Getting Justice Barrett'


Judge Amy Coney Barrett explained the judicial philosophies of originalism and textualism during her Supreme Court confirmation hearing on Tuesday, adding that Americans should expect her to express her own views within those approaches.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) asked Barrett to explain originalism “in English.”

She replied: “In English, that means that I interpret the Constitution as a law, that I interpret its text as text, and I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it. So that meaning doesn’t change over time, and it’s not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it.”

Graham then asked about Barrett’s close intellectual identification with the the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she clerked.

Trending: ‘The Tide Is Turning’: Jesse Watters Describes The ‘Week That Changed The Race’

“People say that you’re a ‘female Scalia.’ What would you say?” he asked.

She replied:

I would say that

Continue reading

You Might Like

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!