‘1619 Project’ Founder Melts Down At Criticism Of Her Fake History

‘1619 Project’ Founder Melts Down At Criticism Of Her Fake History


The lead writer of the New York Times’ anti-American “1619 Project” suffered a meltdown last week when a colleague at her paper offered fair criticism of its revisionist and inaccurate account of history.

On Oct. 9, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens published a more than 3,000-word essay outlining the project’s blunders that have led the academics with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) to call on the Pulitzer Prize Board to revoke its award to the project’s chief essayist, Nikole Hannah-Jones.

“Journalists are, most often, in the business of writing the first rough draft of history, not trying to have the last word on it,” Stephens wrote. “We are best when we try to tell truths with a lowercase t, following evidence in directions unseen, not the capital-T truth of a pre-established narrative in which inconvenient facts get discarded. And we’re supposed to report and comment on the political issues of the day, not become the issue itself.”

Trending: Watch: Joe Biden Refers to Doug Emhoff as 'Kamala's Wife'

Continue reading

You Might Like

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend